Can my boss require me to have Facebook or a social media account?

UPDATED: Jul 12, 2023Fact Checked

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson

Insurance Lawyer

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Insurance Lawyer

UPDATED: Jul 12, 2023

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

UPDATED: Jul 12, 2023Fact Checked

Employers set terms or conditions on employment–things the employee must do to have or keep the job—such as a car, email and internet access, a cell phone– or that the employee have a social media account. An employee may be terminated for not having what the employer wants.

People often believe that there is a clear or “bright” line between work and their personal life. And that an employer cannot tell them what to do except when they are at work, and/or using employer-provided equipment. That belief is, unfortunately false, in the United State. The employer can put essentially any terms or conditions it wants on employment, including things that seem to cross the line into the employee’s personal life. Employees who refuse to comply may be terminated.

To understand why this is, you have to understand that all employment in the United States is “employment at will” except if–and only if–there is a written employment contract giving the employee some enforceable rights against the employer. In the absence of a contract (including a union or collective bargaining agreement), an employee has essentially no rights to a job or at work, apart from the right to not be discriminated against for certain specifically defined reasons, such as due to race or sex. Otherwise, the employee does not have a right to his or her job, and has the job only so long as the employer wants to employ him or her. That’s what the “at will” in “employment at will” means–that the employee works only at the “will,” or free choice, of the employer.

The employer may, under employment at will, terminate an employee at any time, for any reason. This gives the employer enormous, in fact, nearly total, discretion to set rules or requirements that the employee must adhere to. This includes putting rules or requirements on things that cross the line into the employee’s personal life or limits his or her personal autonomy. Dress and grooming codes are a very good example of this: even though your haircut, your facial hair, your body piercings, and your tattoos are part of you 24/7, not just at work, the employer can require you to dress and groom yourself in a particular way, and terminate you if you don’t comply.

Other examples:

(1) Employers can require employees who do maintenance or make repairs or build things to provide their own tools and safety gear. They’ve always been able to do this, for decades.

(2) An employer which believes its staff may have to drive for work can require employees to have driver’s licenses and cars, even if the employee is happy taking the bus, riding a bike, or even walking.

(3) More recently, employers could require employees to have–and answer– pagers, cell phones, so the employer could reach its staff whenever it wanted. Similarly, an employer can require that an employee have a computer, internet access, and email, for communication purposes or to be able to work offsite.

As you can imagine, if you can require a computer, internet, email, and/or a cell phone, you can also require social media. The employer can require the employee to have a social media account—and also to “friend” the employer on Facebook, or join certain groups on social media. The employer can even require employees to do–or not do–certain things on social media, like posting or reposting certain things (like announcements from, or photographs of, or news accounts about, the employer).

What if the employee has some deep, abiding objection to social media? What can an employee who simply does not want to participate in social media do? Unfortunately, his or her only recourse is to seek other employment (i.e., quit). That is the other side of “employment at will”: the employee can leave a job he or she does not like at any time.

Case Studies: Employment Conditions and Personal Rights

Case Study 1: Social Media Account Requirement

John, an employee, was required by his employer to have a social media account for work purposes. However, John had strong reservations about using social media due to privacy concerns. He sought advice on whether his employer had the right to impose such a requirement and what options he had.

Case Study 2: Personal Equipment and Tools

Sarah and her colleagues, employed in maintenance and repair roles, were mandated by their employer to provide their own tools and safety gear. Sarah, who faced financial constraints, questioned the fairness of this condition. She wondered if there were legal avenues to challenge the employer’s requirement.

Case Study 3: Communication Technology

Mark, an employee, found himself in a situation where his employer enforced a policy that required employees to have personal computers, internet access, and email accounts for work-related communication. Mark, who valued his privacy and preferred not to engage with technology outside of work, sought clarity on the legality of such a requirement.

Case Study 4: Social Media Engagement Guidelines

Sarah, John, and Mark, employees of a company, were asked by their employer to actively engage with specific content on social media and adhere to certain guidelines on their personal profiles. This raised concerns about privacy, freedom of expression, and potential repercussions for non-compliance. They wondered if they could refuse to comply without risking their employment.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson

Insurance Lawyer

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Insurance Lawyer

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption